First, review this fine cautionary tale available here, courtesy of the ACLU:
Now, I am no great fan of the ACLU, but credit where credit is due, this piece sums up the dangers of all those clever national IDs, government administered programs, linked databases, and GPS-enabled devices nicely. In fact, just two short years later, much of what is portrayed already exists:
- businesses use caller-ID to recognize phones and link to customer information
- even if the government didn’t give it out, businesses would certainly use a national ID number as a key—just as they use the SSN currently
- your home address, birthday, name, etc. are all already keyed to the current equivalent of a national ID—your SSN
- where you work is almost certainly on file—didn’t they ask the last time you applied for credit or a loan?
- cell phones with GPS currently do broadcast your location to services that request that information—unless you configure them not to
- businesses already assign delivery areas or prices by risk of the neighborhood—as those living near shady areas know—and as crime stats become more instantly available, this can only increase
- as businesses partner to offer shared customer incentives, exchanging information about recent purchases and coupon offers is becoming commonplace
- certainly whether your cards are maxed out is easy—a quick query to each card could do that
And some things, which have not yet come to pass (as it were) are terrifyingly likely:
- currently legislation protects your health care information, but either government-run healthcare or single-payer schemes would require releasing it to the government at the least
- legislation to allow the government to regulate food and lifestyle choices for health is already proposed—once the government’s actually paying for health-care, what will happen
- currently the health-care industry and insurance industry would love to be notified about people’s purchases and force them to sign waivers—unlike them, government can actually enforce such desires
- in our climate of constant fear of terror attacks, does opening travel itineraries to public scrutiny seem farfetched?
Horrifyingly, the only thing which seemed utterly ridiculous was libraries ever voluntarily making your reading choices public. But amazon.com on the other hand…
Clearly some of what is portrayed is fine, even useful, but some is frighteningly Orwellian.
So where should the line be drawn? Where does the scenario presented cross the line from convenience to surveillance? As technology advances it seems increasingly impossible to effectively compartmentalize information, so should we assume that whatever the government knows about us will find its way into private hands? And just how much should the government know about us, anyway?
Discuss amongst yourselves!