Our motto here at the 12 Angry Men Blog is “Through angry words, civil discourse”. While we pride ourselves on being nattering nabobs of negativity, we also realize that sometimes people disagree with our many varied, and admittedly arrogant, opinions. We respect this quite a lot. Freedom of speech is one of the things that makes this country the great place it is, and as patriots we believe in the right of anyone to tell us what they think, no matter how stupid and ignorant their opinion might be.

In celebration of Freedom of Speech and civil discourse it is our plan to bring you some of the best hate mail we receive each week. We promise to dredge the bottoms of our inboxes to bring you the most trollish, flaming, piles of ignorant opinion we have received each week. So please, send us hate mail. We want you to! We’ll even post it if we feel you’ve done a particularly good job. We feel every one of our readers deserves the chance to see us respond to your mail in the most public and humiliating way possible.

This Week’s Winner: Margaret King

This week we’re in luck! We get a special feature, not one but two hate mails from Ms. King!

Stem cell research is a priority for thousands of disabled Americans and their families. Bill Richardson is a Godsend to them.

For the sake of argument, let’s assume that potentially helping “thousands of disabled Americans” outweighs the moral evil of killing thousands of genetically distinct members of the species homo sapiens in the context of ESC research. That appears to be your assumption, so let’s go with it. In that case, Bill Richardson is a cheapskate who wants to piss away $10 million dollars on a half-rate institute at a crappy university. States like New Jersey and California who are whole hog into this ESC thing are pouring metric buttloads of money into ESC research. By comparison, Mr. Richardson looks like he’s handing out petty cash. To me this sounds like Mr. Richardson is more of a “man trying to become president, by throwing bones to key constituencies” than a “Godsend.”

The writer of the above piece has little or no insight into Governor Richardson’s intelligence and his ability to apply that intelligence to the development and implementation of many needed ideas and programs.

If you replace the phrase “insight into” with “confidence in,” I agree with the above statement wholeheartedly.

Compared to the billions that GWB has squandered waging war, stealing resources for corporations of his cohorts, and putting the United States in peril both economically and politically, $10 million dollars to begin to find help for thousands of disabled Americans, is the epitomy of decency.

Yes, and compared to Satan himself, even President Bush’s utterly pointless war in Iraq looks like “the epitomy (sic) of decency.” Compared to Mr. Bush, spending $10 million on the “Angry New Mexican’s Bahamas Retirement Fund” sounds great too. But who cares? That’s no argument for Mr. Richardson. He’s still pissing away our tax money on something that, even discounting moral issues, won’t amount to a hill of beans. Now that is no godsend.

Long live Bill Richardson.

Indeed. And may he have a long, productive, and happy retirement from politics!

Our children will pay for GWB and his supporters for the rest of their lives.

So? This has what to do with Mr. Richardson? Oh yes, ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!

At least, New Mexico is doing something caring and rational to help the citizens.

No, it’s half-assed (not to mention morally bankrupt). If Mr. Richardson actually gave a rat’s bottom, he’d pony up serious cash. As things stand, Mr. Richardson’s plans won’t make an iota of a difference. Now, perhaps “half-assed” and “rational” have a similar meaning to you. Perhaps you went to Rio Grande High School, which would explain many things. However, in my world “half-assed” and “rational” are about as far apart as the “east” and the “west.”

Aggressive stem cell research and the need for implementation is long over due.

If you replace “due” with “hyped,” I agree with the above statement entirely.

You must be from an island in the Southern U.S. Are you related to Strom Thurmond, or do you just have difficulty helping the disenfranchised, disabled people in New Mexico and in the United States? Hooray for Governor Bill Richardson.

Ah yes, the ad hominem the last refuge of someone who has run out of arguments for their indefensible point. Mmmmm… I savor its sweet flavor. Please be sure to have the “disenfranchised” disabled people talk to a good lawyer about how Strom Thurmond wanna-bes like me have been depriving them of voting rights. I hear that David Iglesias is looking for business these days…

Editor’s note: As usual, the spelling mistakes of the original poster are left intact for the reader’s pleasure.

Our motto here at the 12 Angry Men Blog is “Through angry words, civil discourse”. While we pride ourselves on being nattering nabobs of negativity, we also realize that sometimes people disagree with our many varied, and admittedly arrogant, opinions. We respect this quite a lot. Freedom of speech is one of the things that makes this country the great place it is, and as patriots we believe in the right of anyone to tell us what they think, no matter how stupid and ignorant their opinion might be.

In celebration of Freedom of Speech and civil discourse it is our plan to bring you some of the best hate mail we receive each week. We promise to dredge the bottoms of our inboxes to bring you the most trollish, flaming, piles of ignorant opinion we have received each week. So please, send us hate mail. We want you to! We’ll even post it if we feel you’ve done a particularly good job. We feel every one of our readers deserves the chance to see us respond to your mail in the most public and humiliating way possible.

This Week’s Winner: Conservative Gladiator

The best part about this foaming-at-the-mount Mitt Romney fan is that (s)he can’t be bothered to change his ignorant (and literacy challenged) posts for different web sites. See his/her identical post here. A big thanks to Angry Albuquerquian for pointing this one out for me!

Wow…From the liberal press: “send out the “Conservatives” to shoot down their own.”

First, the grammarian in me notes that single (rather than double) quotes are to be used inside a quotation delineated by quotation marks.

Some serious hunters out there huh?

When I was a kid I went hunting with my Uncle who was avid. He helped me take my hunter’s safety course and I shot guns and hunted for maybe a year’s worth of my life.

Congratulations. You killed Bambi’s dad. I hope you enjoyed the tasty venison.

I still to this day consider myself Pro-Gun and Pro-Second Amendment. No where in the LIBERAL article that you got this info from, and you need to admit, that you would have never picked up on it otherwise because you are “Conservative”, does it say that Romney stated that he was against the Second Amendment in the past. While it may have been an error in stating “I’ve been a lifelong hunter”, be honest and quote the whole dialogue and you’ll see that there’s nothing there. Even the article is not that deep. It’s the headline that says more than the article.

Dear Chicago Manual of Style: Please note that Conservative Gladiator has officially modified the English language. From this point forward, the word conservative must be written as “Conservative” and the word liberal as LIBERAL. On behalf of “Conservative” Gladiator, the 12 Angry Men Blog thanks you for your cooperation.

Dear Gary Trudeau: As a long time reader of your comic Doonesbury, I have heard the comic referred to as many things, including liberal LIBERAL. However, a recent post by “Conservative” Gladiator has referred to it as an “article.” The three panel comic I cited in this post as a source for Mitt Romney’s newfound pro-gun stance was packed with information, and I thank you for reaching the level of detail (s)he considered to be article-quality. But, given his/her obvious trouble with the English language, I would not be surprised if My Pet Goat has reached the novella status in “Conservative” Gladiator’s book. Thanks again for the informative comic article.

Look rather than attacking the other people in the race so that you can prop your guy, why don’t you go to your guy’s campaign and ask why he isn’t doing more? Why is their message only attracting the “Wiley” intellectuals like yourselves?

As the State Coordinator of “Wiley” New Mexicans for Hillary, I resent your obvious sexism in assuming that my candidate is male! Oh wait, I’m not involved in the Clinton campaign at all! But you don’t know that, do you? As far as you know, I could be Hillary Clinton!

You make the assumption that I have bestowed my blogger’s blessing on one particular candidate. Well, if you’ve read my previous article, you realize that I don’t have a problem slamming any and all of the Republican candidates (don’t worry: the Democrats are coming next). To suggest that I’m just a shill for “my guy” is just absurd.

If you’re attacking is based on your hate for Mitt Romney religion then I suggest you go to the other side where they welcome bigots as long as they can do it without being called on it.

I’m attacking Mr. Romney for being a waffling flip-flop that would make Bill “it depends on what your definition of is is” Clinton proud. I imagine that if he were a more devout Mormon, he might have, you know, convictions.

You “Conservatives” need to grow up and leave the left wing propaganda and attacks to them. Heaven forbid that your guy comes to the front and they get shouted out for every little asinine thing they do and to top that off it’s your own that start’s to eat at him. I don’t see you guys licking your chops for Rudy and what did he just say about abortion again?

I ripped on Mr. Giuliani in the very same article, being very careful to note that Mr. Giuliani doesn’t give a rat’s bottom about social conservatism (generally understood to be a keyword for abortion and gay marriage). But I guess you just had trouble seeing that part. Perhaps an eye exam would be in order…

Editor’s note: Spelling and grammar mistakes in “Conservative” Gladiator’s post have been preserved to allow him/her to make my argument for me.

Our motto here at the 12 Angry Men Blog is “Through angry words, civil discourse”. While we pride ourselves on being nattering nabobs of negativity, we also realize that sometimes people disagree with our many varied, and admitedly arrogant, opinions. We respect this quite a lot. Freedom of speech is one of the things that makes this country the great place it is, and as patriots we believe in the right of anyone to tell us what they think, no matter how stupid and ignorant their opinion might be.

In celebration of Freedom of Speech and civil discourse it is our plan to bring you some of the best hate mail we recieve each week. We promise to dredge the bottoms of our inboxes to bring you the most trollish, flaming, piles of ignorant opinion we have recieved each week. So please, send us hate mail. We want you too! We’ll even post it if we feel you’ve done a particularly good job. We feel everyone of our readers deserves the chance to see us respond to your mail in the most public and humiliating way possible.