“The tree of capitalism must be refreshed from time to time with the
blood of investors and bankers.” — Angry Political Optimist
James Burke once wrote, in an essay entitled “Fit to Rule”, that the modern world was connected to root events having to do with Linnaeus. His penchant to catalog and organize nature led to Darwin’s Galapagos trip; and from that Karl Mark derived his economic theories giving rise to Communism. Nietzsche’s interpretation, itself misinterpreted, philosophically enabled Nazism and Hitler and the “manifest destiny” derivative in the hands of J. P. Morgan and Getty gave rise to capitalism. Finding root causes is always an interesting journey. So when one looks around today, especially with politicians eager to cast the blame on others, it’s good to try and establish what exactly the root cause of the current fiscal mess might, in fact, be.
The story begins in 1933 at the end of the Great Depression with the passing of the Glass-Steagall Act by Congress (F.D. Roosevelt administration) which prohibited banks from selling investments and created firewalls between investment banking, commercial banking and insurance. Soon after, in order to resolve the mismatch in maturities in loans, and because banks couldn’t loan enough to support the post WWII baby boom, the Federal National Mortgage Association or “Fannie Mae” was created as part of the New Deal in 1938 (FDR administration) to provide a secondary market for mortgages. This organization purchased loans from banks which then allowed them to continue to service and lend. And all was good — the greatest generation prospered.
For thirty years, FNMA had a near monopoly on the secondary market, then, in 1968, FNMA was privatized by L.B Johnson because of Vietnam War fiscal pressure. Now, as a private entity, FNMA could generate profits, yet FNMA still obtained special treatment under regulatory and tax laws. As a consequence of this, investors perceived minimal risk in the company. In 1970, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC) or Freddie Mac, was created under the Emergency Home Finance Act. The FHLMC purchased mortgages on the secondary market, aggregated, tranched, and sold them as asset backed securities (ABS). Between them, FNMA and FHLMC was estimated to hold approximately 90% of all US mortgages accounting for 46% of the national debt.
Then Congress exempted FNMA and FHLMC from the FDIC Bank Holding Company Act capital/asset ratio reserve limit of 3%. Fannie and Freddie were free to leverage their assets. In 1999, the Graham-Leech-Bliley Act, supported by Robert Rubin (Clinton-Administration) repealed the 1933 Glass-Steagall Act and allowed banks to invest in securities, offer securities, and a cafeteria of financial services. This provided an immediate market for FNMA stock, especially as these shares were considered low risk investments and were returning high returns on investment. The 1995 interpretive letter approving low income mortgage securities as viable investments under the 1977 Community Reinvestment Act (12 CFR parts 25, 228, 345, and 563e) provided another market for FNMA. Commercial banks could now invest CRA dollars in FNMA legally. In 1992 Congress (H.W. Bush administration) mandated (GAO report number GAO-04-269T) that Fannie and Freddie increase their purchases of mortgages for low-income and medium-income borrowers and specified that approval metrics such as the ratio test should henceforth include unemployment and welfare payments as sources of income. HUD (Clinton administration) established ‘quotas’ for FNMA and FHLMC to insure 50% of all their loans be to minorities by 2001. Since FNMA and FHLMC are secondary markets, they pressured originating banks to offer more minority loans.
(The story accelerates to Internet time.) FHA regulations are written with loopholes that allows 0% down-payment mortgages. Down payment assistance market develops to exploit the loophole. The Zero Down Payment Act of 2004, introduced by Rep. Pat Tiberi (R-OH) (G.W. Bush administration), requires the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) to offer federally insured mortgage loans to certain eligible households to buy a house without a down payment. In 2005, FNMA revises its loan approval criteria to support post hurricane rebuilding.
The Rating Reform Act of 2006 passes into Law requiring the use of “Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations” or “NRSROs”. As a result, internal credit analysis at investment banks deteriorate. In 2007, FASB 157 is imposed on corporations requiring that assets be marked to market. Also in 2007, the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) increased the FNMA conforming loan limit upwards to $729,750. This increase in allowed principle increased profit for FNMA. All these regulations and acts let FNMA and FHLMC offer securities at net interest margins that were extremely profitable. FHA mortgages with 0% down make it impossible for banks to compete. Banks have to match terms in order to compete. Financial houses have to develop new instruments in secondary markets to compete with FNMA and FHLMC.
At this point the dominoes are all aligned and ready to go. Backtrack in time slightly and pick up a second parallel thread. Two events occur: investors realize that a few lines of software, a pretty business plan, and a catchy name do not a market make; and two planes make unauthorized landings into downtown Manhattan. The 1-2 punch of the Internet bubble bursting and 9/11 sends the economy into a recession. The Federal Open Market Committee (“Fed”) ratchets interest rates lower and makes a horrible mistake, leaving them low for far too long. Liquidity is generated with nowhere to go since money markets and deposits are generating low returns. Well, there is always real estate.
Quants on Wall Street create new classes of securities to access this liquidity — Collateralized Mortgage Obligations (CMOs) and Structured Investment Vehicles (SIVs). Quants are not stupid and know that these are risky, so they create credit default swaps (CDSs) to cover and distribute the risk. Markets develop to trade these instruments. Purchases go global. Trillions of dollars are traded in these vehicles.
With easy money and low interest loans, more houses are constructed, exceeding the number of available buyers, even at 0% down. The value of real estate drops on market fundamentals (law of supply and demand). The underlying value of mortgages drop. Loans are valued at more than the house or real estate they are collateralized with. Because many houses were purchased on speculation, and the dollars invested are essentially zero, owners walk way leaving banks with securitized assets that are non-producing. The primary cascade starts.
As underlying values tank, derivatives such as CMOs and SIVs collapse and swap liabilities under CDS’s increase. FASB 157 requires assets to be marked to market and assets are devalued accordingly. As assets are devalued, new capital to make up the difference is required. However, the complex interconnection of derivatives and new investment vehicles do not provide mechanisms to evaluate risk. Few are willing to invest without an understanding of the risk involved. Bank and investment company outlooks become speculative and their stock prices reflect this. Rating agencies downgrade the companies. This triggers additional capital requirements written into the CDS contracts. The cascade increases. FASB 157 becomes virtually impossible to implement since there effectively is no market. Liquidity stops because 1) banks can’t value what they own; and 2) they don’t loan assets they have because they might need them for capital.
People don’t understand because political parties are off blaming each other. News commentators spew gloom and doom scenarios. Runs on money markets ensue. Money markets sell short term securities to cover withdrawals and the market for commercial paper, which is funded through the money markets, dries up. Liquidity in commercial loans drops. Companies cannot access their lines of credit by commercial paper (bonds, etc,) Companies have to restrict operations and downsize.
People without jobs cannot pay mortgages. Second stage of cascade begins. Consumers look at institutions and decide that their money isn’t safe. They withdraw funds — banks become insolvent and are seized by the FDIC. Other banks stocks fall as result. Confidence erodes further.
So if we look at the root cause of all this, while Wall Street has it’s share of responsibility, you don’t discipline a dog for urinating on a fire hydrant — he’s just being a dog. Similarly, investment bankers do what they do — borrow and lend money and attempt to make markets. In this case, the road to hell is paved with good intentions and shares of Fannie Mae stock.
September 26, 2008 at 8:50 pm
Not bad, Sonny, not bad. (I suspect I’m considerably older than you, and am therefore allowed to call people of your age “Sonny”.)
You might also want to point out that the cost of $2,330 or so for every man, woman, and child in the US as the cost of the proposed bail out was arrived at by dividing the proposed cost of $700,000,000,000 by the population of the US (approximately 300 million). This assumes, of course, that all the instruments bought are worthless, which is far from the case. The properties backing those loans are real. Most of the loans will be repaid. Even if 25% of the loans default, a truly monstrous number, and if those which fail are only worth 75% of their valuation, another very conservative number, the overall cost will be on the order of $44B; throw in another billion for administration (after all, it is being administered by the government) for a total of $45B and you have a “cost” for each person of $150. Not something I really want to pay for, but if the alternative is a recession, I’m more than willing to kick in my $150 to prevent it.
September 26, 2008 at 10:57 pm
Great summary. I appreciate you starting way back at the real beginning; that’s something I haven’t seen in many of the myriad analyses of the current financial situation. I also like the specific citations on the laws and people involved at each step. If I need to point someone to an article to explain the whats and whys, this will be it.
September 28, 2008 at 10:17 pm
Not something I really want to pay for, but if the alternative is a recession, I’m more than willing to kick in my $150 to prevent it.
Just checking the math:
$700BB X default rate (.25) = $175BB
Default valuation (.75) of $175BB = $131.25BB, loss is (.25) * 175BB = $43.75BB
plus $1BB administration cost = $44.75BB
or $149.16 per person; however this is a minimum of $298.33 per taxpayer since only 50% of the population actually pays taxes; and in accordance with 2007 tax revenue data, those with incomes over $50,000 (~5%)will be paying ~97% of the tax so, if your income is over $50K, you would be paying 97% * $44.75BB / 5% * 300MM or $2,893.83. More, if Mr. Redistributionist is elected.
But of course we all know, those who make over $50,000 are rich and can afford to bail out the investment banks.
March 19, 2009 at 1:51 am
Bottom line: if the Glass-Steagall Act wasn’t repealed, none of this happens.
You did a good job, but you glossed over that law of which, without it’s repeal, none of this happens. I do want to give major kudos because your the only one that has even mentioned that law and it is the law that kept banks from doing this kind of thing for almost 60 years. No way to turn that back now with these “Super Banks”.
May 7, 2009 at 9:08 pm
[…] Countrywide Financial has crashed due to management and regulatory failures. The entire mortgage banking system crashed as a result of bad loans securitized by FNMA and FHLMC. See Fit to Fail. […]
August 13, 2009 at 12:01 pm
May I tell with you an experiment that brought me good money.
I tried lots of ways to make money;
the ones this forum is about .
And I searched out exactly what suits me in the utmost. Well, I can’t tell forex from casino gambling.
I’m a lazy person , and I like to travel , and not to spoil (mar) eyes idling in front of the computer.
Not long ago , made a blog in which I would like to open some some ways of excavating cash from the from the Web.
Intrigued?
visit my web site http://www.theinvestblog.com .
October 9, 2011 at 5:45 am
It?s arduous to seek out knowledgeable folks on this matter, but you sound like you recognize what you?re talking about! Thanks