A very creative depiction of the United States prompted an interesting discussion among the Angry Men this past week. One of the most striking features of the map is the complete absence of our nation’s capital, which prompted our Angry Overeducated Catholic to rejoice that our nation is blessed by having an insignificant capital city. After all, a large capital suggests a large government, and a larger capital would have made it onto the map. As AOC put it, “All true sons of the Founding Fathers should rejoice that, despite the best efforts of socialist weenies like the Democrats, foreigners still don’t give a fig about our capital.”
As a long-time DC area resident (like the Angry Midwesterner, actually, no matter what he might tell you), I too noticed the conspicuous absence of our capital city. I wouldn’t draw too many conclusions about this particular map: Just like the word “anecdote”, the plural of the term “funny picture on the Internet” is not “data”. In reality, the large number of international tourists in DC suggests that foreigners actually care more about Washington than most Americans do. Every American I meet from outside of DC says something like, “Oh, yeah, I was there once in fifth grade,” and all they seem to remember is the oppressive summer weather and a lot of buildings with columns on the front of them.
However, I would agree with a complementary point to AOC’s, which is that sons of the Founding Fathers should rejoice when Americans don’t give a fig about our capital. Having pretty monuments that attract Japanese people with cameras does not suggest that our government is too powerful. However, having too many people and jobs in our capital city suggests that our government is too powerful, and in fact that’s exactly the situation that we are in. Relative to its humble beginnings (to paraphrase Monty Python, “When I started here, all there was was swamp. Other kings said I was daft to build a White House on a swamp, but I built it all the same, just to show ’em. It was burned down by the British, then sank into the swamp. So, I built a second one, and that one stayed up!”) or even its recent past, the Washington area is growing like a Republican president’s budget deficit.
Of course, I now have to take that point about “small capital = good” and turn the political implication (“socialist weenie Democrats”) on its head. The Washington area (particularly Northern Virginia) has exploded over the past few decades, with millions of people and numerous businesses moving to the area. Besides triggering an automotive transit clusterf**k of Los Angeles proportions, this migration suggests that our government is growing too quickly. However, these people and businesses are not here because they want to work for the Department of Agriculture or the Department of Commerce or all of the Departments of Things That Even Well Educated Americans Can’t Be Bothered To Remember. Rather, they’re all here directly or indirectly because of the Department of Defense and the Department of Homeland Security.
As someone who has looked for a job in the DC area, I can tell you that you can’t do anything more than flip burgers without a security clearance in this town (and that’s not because you’re going to work for some Super Secret Welfare Program, either). I’m currently in the process of finishing a graduate engineering degree, and I’m planning to move away following graduation because I don’t want to work for the military and I don’t want to work for some three-letter agency that is in the business of spying on Americans. If I stay in Virginia, I simply won’t have any other choices.
So, I would agree that a big and thriving capital is a bad thing, though I would argue that it’s a bad thing because it represents the excesses of the American War Machine and not the excesses of an alleged welfare state.
November 20, 2007 at 4:56 pm
Actually, given that I don’t currently live in Northern Virginia, and that I haven’t in 8 1/2 years, I wouldn’t really qualify as a “long term resident”. I once was, which is why I hate that state with such a passion.
November 20, 2007 at 5:32 pm
IMO, the fact that the capital (DC) isn’t the commercial center (until recently, New York) was largely an accident of history. DC was picked as the capital as a compromise between Southern and Northern states. New York was, of course, the first capital (under the 1787 Constitution) and is the East Coast’s big commercial center. At one point in the 19th Century, Baltimore was a very large port, but that city’s declined relative to others. But as easy to find histories will tell you, the size of DC grew first with the Civil War, and it has been subsequent wars that made DC get large.
I thought, though, that Northern Virginia had a lot of businesses of various sorts, particularly in tech?
November 20, 2007 at 5:55 pm
Yes, the tech industry in Northern Virginia is huge, including 100% civilian companies such as AOL. However, I would argue that the civilian tech companies ended up there for reasons that are tied to the government’s influence. For one thing, there is an enormous amount of Internet infrastructure there going all the way back to the Internet’s ARPANet origins, making it a good place to set up shop if you’re expecting a lot of traffic and don’t want to be in a different timezone than your servers. For another, a lot of primarily civilian consulting companies set up shop in the area thinking of a possibility of establishing a military/government wing. For a third reason, as much as it irks my liberal heart to use the phrase, there is a lot of “trickle-down” technology business, where a company provides a generic civilian technology (e.g. storage solutions) that is purchased by the other companies that get their paychecks from Uncle Sam.
So, while I exaggerated to say that there are absolutely no 100%-civilian technology jobs in NoVa, I still maintain that Northern Virginia’s technological prominence stems both directly and indirectly from its connection to the good ol’ military-industrial complex.
November 20, 2007 at 7:57 pm
AV wrote:
###So, while I exaggerated to say that there are absolutely no 100%-civilian technology jobs in NoVa, I still maintain that Northern Virginia’s technological prominence stems both directly and indirectly from its connection to the good ol’ military-industrial complex.###
Yeah, that’s how I would have figured it. Of course, there are other places heavily influenced by the MIC, e.g., Silicon Valley. Over time, however (maybe with NoVa the exception), the government has become a smaller and smaller part of the economy. Uncle Sam used to be able to dictate to tech companies; not anymore.